We have met the enemy and he is us

June 19, 2012

In 168 BC the Greek ruler, Antiochus led an attack on Egypt. Before reaching Alexandria, his path was blocked by a Roman envoy, who delivered a message from the Roman Senate directing Antiochus to withdraw his armies from Egypt and Cyprus, or consider themselves in a state of war with the Roman Republic.

Antiochus said he would discuss it with his council, whereupon the Roman ambassador instructed a soldier to draw a line in the sand around Antiochus and said, “Before you cross this circle I want you to give me a reply for the Roman Senate” – implying that Rome would declare war if the Greek ruler stepped out of the circle without committing to leave Egypt immediately. Weighing his options, Antiochus wisely chose to withdraw.

The above story recounts the origin of the “line in the sand” metaphor depicting confrontation, adversarilism, and an ultimatum. And, while this conflict took place more than 2,000 years ago, similar showdowns between service providers and customers occur daily in a variety of forms. Here’s one particularly egregious example from a disillusioned supermarket employee.

Customers are not the enemy. Instead of fostering an adversarial service culture by refusing to make exceptions, admonishing customers, reacting defensively, and enforcing customer-unfriendly policies, service providers should embrace customers for who they really are: the source of their incomes, group health insurance, and retirement nest eggs. (Don’t kid yourself. All of these benefits—in addition to the last pair of shoes you purchased for yourself or your child—were made possible by your customers’ spending.)

The next time you detect a line in the sand between you and your customers, consider inviting them across. That way, you can be on the same side.

Print Friendly

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.karmacrm.com/ John Paul Narowski

    Hey Steve,

    I agree with you about the line in the sand. Too often it seems like service presents customers with an unpleasant ultimatum rather than a quick solution. The line in the sand isn’t intentional – sometimes service reps fail to realize the position of the customer. It’s important to be empathetic and put yourself in your customer’s shoes. 

    Lots of companies view customers from a management perspective,
    instead of a relationship-building perspective. Love your
    customers, and your customers will love your brand.

     

    Businesses need to invest the time, energy and effort
    required to bring in the right people and the right tools to build solid
    relationships. All relationships with customers are, by their very nature,
    social – and we need to remember that. “Managing” customers isn’t a two way
    street – honest, open and flexible relationships are harder to build, but far
    more rewarding for everyone.

     

    John-Paul Narowski, Founder – karmaCRM 

  • http://stevecurtin.com Steve Curtin

    John, thanks for taking the time to read and comment. I agree with your observation that sometimes reps fail to realize the position of the customer and, unwittingly, draw a line in the sand by simply modeling observed behavior or repeating something they heard a supervisor say previously.
    Oftentimes, these actions have to do with upholding company policy. For example, I recall while working in full-service hotels that guests who attempted to use a luggage cart without the assistance of a bellman were denied on the grounds of company policy. Front office management and hourly-paid employees would state that, due to liability, a bellman must accompany the cart. I even once overheard a bellman refuse to relinquish a luggage cart to a hotel guest by comparing it to a request to use a mechanic’s tools (to avoid paying the mechanic).
    By enforcing this “policy,” hotel employees sabotaged the first and last impressions of many guests who decided to rebelliously take the cart anyway, begrudgingly accept the assistance of a tip-hungry bellman, or make several trips to and from their cars with their belongings. Worse, these customers are labeled “difficult” or “cheap” by hotel staff—which fostered resentment and adversarialism.
    What’s the answer? Get rid of the customer-unfriendly policy (assuming one even exists) and let the guest borrow the cart! Some will say, “But if you let one guest do it, then every guest will do it.” Not true. Most full-service hotel guests appreciate the availability of bellman to assist with their luggage. (Do-it-yourselfers tend to avoid full-service and luxury hotels.) What we’re talking about is a hotel guest who is an exception. And exceptions require exceptional customer service.
    Perhaps the guest is traveling with his family and it’s going to take him a while to organize and pack the travel crib, diaper bag, cooler, and various and sundry other items unique to this season of life. Let him borrow the cart for heaven’s sake so that he can take his time and not feel pressured by detaining a bellman.

  • http://www.karmacrm.com/ John Paul Narowski

    Hey Steve, no problem – as a customer enthusiast myself I thoroughly enjoy reading the blog. 

    The bellman example is great as well. Sometimes policies that are intended to help or protect customers just don’t work as intended. I agree, removing the policy is the best way to go. But that’s not always possible. 
    In the cases when it’s not, I think the best remedy is full transparency. Explain to the customer why the policy is in place, and what the intention is. That way, at the very least, he or she will understand that you had their interest in mind!

    For example: Let’s say you run a business renting Mopeds. The Mopeds are speed-capped for your customers’ safety. One customer complains about not being able to keep up with traffic. Do you remove the speed cap?

    Interested to hear your thoughts about situations like that. 

    Cheers,

    John-Paul Narowski, Founder – karmaCRM

  • http://stevecurtin.com Steve Curtin

    John, I agree there are useful policies and procedures in place to protect the company, its employees and customers while maintaining standards. Your example of a speed cap is one of them. It’s in the best interest of all parties to govern the speed of the recreational mopeds and may even be tied to local laws or insurance policies that dictate terms of use (speed, protective equipment, liability waivers, etc.). Your comment regarding transparency is right-on. In the case of the moped rental company, the speed cap (and all usage terms/equipment modifications) should be well-publicized via signage, orientation video, and/or oral reinforcement at the point of purchase. Customers don’t mind surprises – as long as they’re pleasant surprises.
    Thanks for taking the time to read and comment.

  • http://www.salesportal.com/ SalesPortal

    John hit the nail on the head with his comment, “Sometimes policies that are intended to help or protect customers just don’t work as intended.” You can’t plan for every scenario, so it’s important to recognize situations when the standard policy is only going to make things worse. 

  • http://stevecurtin.com Steve Curtin

    I like Nordstrom’s employee handbook which governs employee behavior with: “Use your best judgment in all situations. There will be no additional rules.”

  • http://stevecurtin.com Steve Curtin

    John, I agree there are useful policies and procedures in place to protect the company, its employees and customers while maintaining standards. Your example of a speed cap is one of them. It’s in the best interest of all parties to govern the speed of the recreational mopeds and may even be tied to local laws or insurance policies that dictate terms of use (speed, protective equipment, liability waivers, etc.). Your comment regarding transparency is right-on. In the case of the moped rental company, the speed cap (and all usage terms/equipment modifications) should be well-publicized via signage, orientation video, and/or oral reinforcement at the point of purchase. Customers don’t mind surprises – as long as they’re pleasant surprises.
    Thanks for taking the time to read and comment.

  • http://twitter.com/JLWatsonConsult Jim Watson

    Well-said, Steve.

    How have you seen companies train customer-facing employees to effectively make exceptions to policy?

    What  kinds of initiatives/approaches have  you seen used effectively?

    Thanks Steve,

    Jim Watson
    Portland, Maine

  • http://stevecurtin.com Steve Curtin

    Jim, thanks for taking the time to read and comment. The most effective companies I’ve observed don’t rely on training existing employees to effectively make exceptions to policy. Instead, they invest a disproportionate amount of time/money in their selection processes in order to identify job candidates that will use their best judgment in making exceptions to company policies.
    Of course, the company culture and performance management practices must allow for this discretion. My favorite illustration of this is Nordstrom’s employee handbook cited below in an earlier comment: “Use your best judgment in all situations. There will be no additional rules.”
    Having said all that, if I were to inherit an existing staff that relied on policy to direct their behavior (apart from exercising good judgment), I would reframe their view of exceptions, reminding them that exceptions require exceptional customer service. I would then model the desired behavior, affirm others when I observed them handling an exception well and coach them when I observed them mishandling exceptions and applying policy in a situation that did not warrant it.
    I know, I know…easier said then done. That’s why companies like Nordstrom, L.L.Bean and Zappos are themselves exceptions…

Connect with Steve

Begin generating enthusiasm for your customers today!

Phone
303.325.1375

Email
info@stevecurtin.com